A New Predator Is Stalking Crypto’s Old Guard: Qubic’s Threat to Dogecoin

A New Predator Is Stalking Crypto’s Old Guard: Qubic's Threat to Dogecoin

A new predator is stalking the crypto landscape—and its next target is Dogecoin.

Qubic, an AI-focused blockchain project, has confirmed it successfully executed a 51% attack on privacy coin Monero, seizing majority control of its hashrate and reorganizing blocks at will. Now, in a public vote, its community has chosen the world’s largest memecoin as its next victim.

Rather than stealing coins outright, Qubic has built a system of economic warfare—redirecting rewards from rival blockchains into its own token burn.

Rundown

  • The Playbook: Qubic successfully took majority control of Monero’s hashrate, framing the 51% attack as a “stress test.” The project’s founder, Sergey Ivancheglo, confirmed the move, which led exchanges like Kraken to halt XMR deposits.
  • Dogecoin is the Next Target: Following the Monero attack, Qubic’s community voted via Discord to target Dogecoin next. Ivancheglo made the announcement public: “The Qubic community has chosen Dogecoin.”
  • A New Kind of Attack: Qubic calls its model “useful Proof-of-Work,” where it hijacks a network’s mining power, converts the rewards to stablecoins, and uses them to buy and burn its own QUBIC token. Critics call it a “vampire attack”—an economic parasite that drains value from its hosts.

The Playbook

Founder Sergey Ivancheglo—better known as “Come-from-Beyond,” a controversial IOTA co-founder—framed the Monero strike as a “stress test.” But the effect was real: hashrate dominance, chain reorganizations, and exchanges like Kraken halting XMR deposits.

“Monero appears to be in the midst of a successful 51% attack,” warned Charles Guillemet, CTO of Ledger. Despite Qubic’s claim that the network’s “core functionality remains intact,” the message was clear: the project could disrupt a major proof-of-work chain at will.

Dogecoin in the Crosshairs

With Monero subdued, Qubic escalated. On Discord, its community voted to target Dogecoin—a ~$35 billion network with global name recognition but far lower hashrate security than Bitcoin.

“The Qubic community has chosen Dogecoin,” Ivancheglo announced. The move turns a proof-of-concept into a headline confrontation, forcing Dogecoin to face its most serious threat since inception.

A New Predator Is Stalking Crypto’s Old Guard: Qubic's Threat to Dogecoin

Useful Proof-of-Work—or Vampire Attack?

Qubic calls its strategy “useful Proof-of-Work” (uPoW). Its mining capacity floods a target chain, block rewards are converted into stablecoins, and those proceeds buy and burn Qubic’s native token.

The loop is self-feeding: the target chain is drained while Qubic’s tokenomics get a deflationary boost. Miners profit without concern for the host’s health.

When pressed on the point—“What’s the advantage beyond manipulating Qubic’s token price with buybacks and burns?”—Ivancheglo responded: “A lot of electricity is burned for useless #PoW, we need that electricity for #AI. These words may be hard to get and I cannot reveal more now, in the future they will eventually click.”

Critics in Monero’s community call it a “vampire attack”—a parasitic model that doesn’t kill outright but siphons away economic life.

ChainStreet’s Take

What Qubic calls a ‘stress test’ is, in reality, the weaponization of hashrate.

Classic 51% attacks were smash-and-grab, focused on double-spends. Qubic’s version is subtler, more insidious. It weakens a chain’s security budget while propping up its own ecosystem, leaving the host alive but compromised.

That playbook puts every mid-tier proof-of-work network in the crosshairs. If Dogecoin—backed by celebrity fandom and global brand value—can be undermined, no chain outside Bitcoin’s fortress-level hashrate is safe.

The deeper question: what is blockchain security worth if its own economic incentives can be inverted? Proof-of-work was built on the idea that hashrate guaranteed resilience. Qubic just proved it can be turned into a weapon.

Dogecoin is now on the clock.

The author, a seasoned journalist with no cryptocurrency holdings, presents this article for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or an endorsement of any cryptocurrency, security, or other financial instrument. Readers should conduct their own research and, if needed, consult a licensed financial professional before making any financial decisions.